Hey I was at Antietam on a beautiful Saturday in March and I couldn't help but compare what I saw to the War of Rights world.
I noticed a general theme that showed War of Rights seeming to exaggerate distances by about 50%. This is something I did myself often before visiting places first-hand. Gettysburg was a shock the first time (2002). I expected the immortalized spots to be bigger than they were and was left with an overall thought of that happened here?.
The biggest two areas that stood out are WoR's "Bloody Lane" and the "Dunker Church."
The bend which contains the WoR objective is quite a bit smaller than shown. And also, I think just about everyone agrees the worm fences didn't stand during the Confederate defense so will there ever be a day we see them become a pile of boards?
IMG_5043.jpg
And the small rocky knoll approaching the Dunker Church feels much closer than in WoR. Looking back at the pictures, it doesn't look so bad. But it didn't feel right at all being there.
IMG_5039.jpg
IMG_5042.jpg
No idea why the 2nd photo keeps uploading sideways.
Also I'm not sure what resources were used for mapping it but the terrain is far, far more rolling and than shown in WoR. It was almost sadistically designed terrain in places due to the frequency of the high and low elevations.
Does any of this really matter that much? Probably not.