Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Bayonet Charge

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #4

    USA Captain

    TheRegulator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by McMuffin View Post
    It's not needed. The bayonet system when finished will be considerably better than it is now, and better than BF1. And as Shiloh said, hand to hand combat was not super common because people didn't want to go into the enemy lines with a bayonet and their friends, possibly facing multiple walls of fire. And the BF1 system does a whole animation and you are incredibly vulnerable along with you cannot easily maneuver or get out of it, which we would want in WoR.
    Better than BF1 (That will require a lot, as its very good )..... How do you know ? No one knows much about that, except those who make the game.
    And the claim that bayonets where not used much is not right .... Its build on the perception that only a few came into field hospitals with stab wounds ... And then the conclusion, that it was rear cause of death. Its wrong !
    Close combat was deadly ... And the dead stayed on the battelfield, no one will ever be able to tell the right numbers of deaths cause by the bayonet, for the same reason.
    Last edited by TheRegulator; 12-02-2017 at 12:14 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •