Transparancy is wanted about the coming features. It's all to vague
Transparancy is wanted about the coming features. It's all to vague
We better be careful or they will start unfoundedly banning and closing threads.
We're not interested in dealing with absolute demands with no degree of consideration for what the outcome may be should those demands be met.
I've tried to highlight the issues we, as developers, see with the demand (I will not call it a suggestion anymore as it is clear now it isn't). Sadly, most of my concerns seem to have been ignored by a few pushing the "give in or we'll leave" agenda.
I had hoped for an actual discussion instead of threats and pitchforks.
If us not giving a shit about you is what you take away from this then that will have to be so - although I regret you interpreting it that way.
- Trusty
Well maybe he is really thanking and taking the feedback into consideration but you never know . It's never a clear answer or roadmap.
I've been here long enough to know that you do not listen to your loyal crowd funders. there is a difference between not adding aesthetics and not allowing people that PAY for a server to lock it down. Demands like that are not unrealistic...people are PAYING for a good experience. If someone wants to lock THEIR SERVER THAT THEY PAID FOR ON A GAME THEY PAID FOR....that is their choice. You are essentially saying you are more concerned with more people buying this game than those who have supported you. Despite the snarky and condescending replies.
Believe me brother...I am.
Last edited by F. L. Villarreal; 04-09-2019 at 09:32 PM.
Please send your feedback to G-Portal then. You are certainly not paying us for the option to rent a server.
We continue to improve upon the admin functionality on the community hosted servers. Last update introduced the tab screen admin tool, allowing for quick and easy kicks/bans of unwanted players.
- Trusty